![]() ![]() The above options are stored in a file called “admin.ini” in the destination folder. These three activation options are “silent” (i.e. Younger students’ if you want MindView to enable the simplified interface as (optional) Check ‘Use simplified interface for.Installation’ if you want to activate MindView during installation. (optional) Check ‘Automatically activate during.Is run’ if you want MindView to be automatically activated the first time the (optional) Check ‘Force activation when MindView. ![]() The Username and Company Name to use as default.The location of the installation package.When the administrative installation starts you will see the following dialog (Figure 1): Insert the command line option /a // after the path to the installation package as in the example below: C:\downloaded files\mindview7_.exe /a //Ĭlick OK to start the Administrative Installation Wizard. Use the Browse button to locate the downloaded MindView installation package. The procedure extracts a complete source image of theĪpplication (similar to the source image found on a DVD). You can create an administrative installation from theĬommand line as follows. To find out more about Windows® Installer and administrative installations, please refer to the Microsoft web site. The domain using Group Policies or a different installation methodology. msi file, you can push the installation to client computers in msi file.Īfter performing an administrative installation orĮxtracting the. exe file so that you or the users in your organization can install MindView using the. Alternatively, you can extract the contents of the. TheyĬould have done better testing, but if the biggest names inĭevelopment can't manage to figure it, I say leave it up to theĬompiler.The Windows® Installer can perform an administrative installation of an application or product to a network for use by a workgroup. In cases where a DLL is missing or a dependency isn't installed. NullReferenceExceptions because _they_ didn't know what would happen Libraries from big names including Novell and Oracle throw The benefit: you can see what aįunction throws and protect yourself without all the babysitting.Ī lack of exception handling is big problem in. People don't think about this, but the exceptions thrown by a moduleĪre part of that module's interface. Here is the program: if me = idiot: exit(). One day, I went through about 10,000 lines of code and moved argumentĬhecking code outside of try blocks because I realized I was handling That may become available later without code changes. Checked exceptions occurīecause of downed databases, missing files, network problems - things They occurīecause of bad code and insufficient testing. In general, unchecked exceptions shouldn't be caught. Throwing generic Exception or inheriting all custom exception typesįrom RuntimeException. Programmers finding ways around the annoyance. I think all of the examples you listed referred specifically to most > See also: > and note especially the comment from the coder who says that he simply > declares his functions to throw Exception (the most generic checked > exception), thus defeating the whole point of checked exceptions. It's main appeal, it seems to me, is to give a > false sense of security to Java developers who fail to realise that under > certain circumstances Java will raise certain checked exceptions *even if > they are not declared*. > Even if that is not true, checked exceptions are a feature that *in > practice* seems to lead to poor exception handling and cruft needed only > to satisfy the compiler: >. > Note also that Bruce Eckel repeats a rumour that checked exceptions were > *literally* an experiment snuck into the Java language while James > Gosling was away on holiday. What indications have there been that this has > been a flaw? I can see it alienating a large group of up- and-coming > developers. Perhaps something to provide or just shut off via a > command line parameter. At the same time, with my limited experience with Java, it has been > a massive annoyance. Languages that don't support > exceptions as part of their signature lead to capturing generic > Exception all throughout code. > On Mon, 13:29:06 -0800, Travis Parks wrote: > Exception handling is one of those subjects few understand and fewer can > implement properly in modern code. On Nov 28, 5:57 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |